Reviewer Guideline

Guidelines for Reviewers
Responsibility of Peer Reviewer
The peer reviewer is responsible for critiquing by reading and evaluating manuscripts in the field of expertise, then giving constructive advice and honest feedback to the author of the article submitted. Peer reviewers discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article, how to increase the strength and quality of the paper, and evaluate the relevance and authenticity of the manuscript.

Before reviewing, please note the following:

1. Is the article requested to be reviewed in accordance with your expertise? If you receive a script that covers the topics that are not appropriate areas of your expertise, please notify the editor as soon as possible. Please recommend an alternative reviewer.

2. Do you have the time to review this paper? The review process must be completed within two-four weeks. If you agree and require a longer period, notify the editor as soon as possible, or suggest an alternative reviewer.

3. Is there any potential conflict of interest? Meanwhile, conflicts of interest will not disqualify you as a reviewer, disclose all conflicts of interest to the editor before reviewing. If you have any questions about potential conflicts of interest, do not hesitate to contact the editorial office.

As a guideline in reviewing papers, peer reviewers should consider some aspects to enhance the quality of the papers. Fill out the review form and enclose it along with the results of the review in the journal system.