CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON KOMPAS.COM NEWS: 'GERAKAN #2019GANTIPRESIDEN' | Putra | LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra

CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON KOMPAS.COM NEWS: 'GERAKAN #2019GANTIPRESIDEN'

Hendri Pitrio Putra(1*), Sulis Triyono(2)
(1) Applied Linguistics, Yogyakarta State University Jl. Colombo No.1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281
(2) 
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.22515/ljbs.v3i2.1412

Abstract

This article is a result of critical discourse analysis (CDA) to the news entitled Gerakan #2019GantiPresiden di Antara Ambiguitas Hukum dan Syahwat Politik at Kompas.com. The approach employed in this research is the three-dimensional CDA developed by Norman Fairclough. The purposes of this research are to describe the micro, mezzo, and macro as well as the social, political and cultural situation from the linguistic aspects in Gerakan #2019GantiPresiden di Antara Ambiguitas Hukum dan Syahwat Politik text. The results show that there are linguistic aspects in the form of diction in the direct sentences that are used by Kompas.com with the theme #2019GantiPresiden. This movement is considered as a constitutional movement indicated as a rebellion because it is supported by political interests towards their current government rival. This is closely related to the background of Kompas.com as a pro-government online mass media. It is also acceptable if Kompas.com creates a positive image of the current government. The main point of information that is conveyed in the news of #2019GantiPresiden is that this movement possibly threats the government of Jokowi Widodo who will run again for the presidential election in 2019.

Keywords


critical discourse analysis, politics, #2019GantiPresiden, Kompas.com

References


Asher, RE & JMY Simpson. 1994. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Chaer, A & L. Agustina, 2004. Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta

Darma, Yoce Aliah. 2009. Analisis Wacana Kritis. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Depdiknas. 2001. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (Edisi ke-3). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Djaroto, T. 2000. Manajemen Penerbitan Pers. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdaya Karya

Eriyanto. 2011. Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman

Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysing for Sosial Research. London: Routledge.

“Gerakan #2019GantiPresiden di antara Ambiguitas Hukum dan Syahwat Politik” on Kompas.com. Accessed on September 10, 2018.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2001. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Leech. Geoffrey. 1997. Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. (Translator: MDD Oka). Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Ranksays Accessed on September 10, 2018

Subroto. 1992. Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis). Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Tan, Ah-Hwee. 1999. Text Mining: The State of the Art and the Challenges, Singapore: Kent Ridge Digital Labs 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace.

Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 35 times
PDF views : 98 times

Dimensions Metrics

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.