Important Notice

This is an archive system. You can read only in this site, for submission and publishing system please visit https://ejournal.uinsaid.ac.id/
 EXPLORING NOMINALIZATION USE IN GRADUATE THESIS ABSTRACTS: AN SFL APPROACH TO ACADEMIC WRITING | Mahfudurido | LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra

EXPLORING NOMINALIZATION USE IN GRADUATE THESIS ABSTRACTS: AN SFL APPROACH TO ACADEMIC WRITING

Ilzam Mahfudurido(1*),Albert Tallapessy(2),Dina Dyah Kusumayanti(3)
(1) Universitas Jember
(2) Universitas Jember
(3) Universitas Jember
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.22515/ljbs.v6i2.3888

Abstract

Abstract becomes the mandatory part of an article which should be concise and lexically condensed. Unfortunately, not all academic writers can meet this demand. Following Halliday & Matthiessen’s (1999) types of the grammatical metaphor in which the nominalization plays as the main tendency of the construal, this study investigates nominalization cases and how they are manifested in the texts. Seven graduate students’ thesis abstracts of the Linguistics Department of a state university in Indonesia were opted as the object of the investigation. Each instance of the nominalization was coded, counted, and classified to decide their types and an in-depth elaboration of how they are manifested in the texts is provided as well. The results showed that the graduate students employed all types of the nominalization to increase the abstracts’ conciseness. The Process nominalization realized from the process-thing transference highly dominates the abstracts. The findings also reveal a wide gap of the nominalization use between the process nominalization and the other types indicating the students’ lower intermediacy of the nominalization mastery in the academic writing. Therefore, the explicit teaching of the nominalization is highly recommended as this could be of value to the students involved in the scientific publication in this university.

Keywords


academic writing, grammatical metaphor, nominalization, thesis abstract

References


Afifi, Nur. 2021. “Exploring the Use of Grammatical Metaphor in Indonesian EFL Learners’ Academic Writing.” Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics10 (3): 719-731. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31759

Al-Khasawneh, Fadi Maher. 2017. “A Genre Analysis of Research Article Abstracts Written by Native and Non-Native Speakers of English”.Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research 4(1): 1-13

Bhatia, Vijay Kumar. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, & Geoffrey Leech. 2002. A Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman

Biber, Douglass & Bethany Gray. 2010. “Challenging Stereotypes about Academic Writing: Complexity, Elaboration, Explicitness.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9 (1): 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001

Derewianka, Beverly. 1995. Language Development in The Transition from Childhood to Adolescence: The Role of Grammatical Metaphor (PhD Dissertation). Sydney, Australia: School of English and Linguistics-Macquarie University. http://hdl.handle. net/1959.14/176445

Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd Edition). New York: Continuum

Ezeifeka, Chinwe R. 2015. “Grammatical Metaphor: In Search of Proficiency in Research Abstract Writing”. SAGE Open 5 (1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F21 582440 15577 667

Fang, Zhihui. 2005. “Scientific Literacy: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective”. Science Education 89 (2): 335-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce. 20050

Fatonah. 2014. “Students' Understanding of the Realization of Nominalizations in Scientific Text.” Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(1): 87-98. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.17509/ ijal.v4i1.602

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & James Robert Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1998. “Things and Relations: Regrammaticizing Experience as Technical Knowledge”. In J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.). Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. (185-235). London: Routledge

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Christian Matthias Ingemar Martin Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience Through Meaning. A Language Based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum

Holtz, Mônica. 2009. Lexico-grammatical Properties of Abstracts and Research Articles: A Corpus-Based Study of Scientific Discourse from Multiple Disciplines (PhD Dissertation). Darmstadt: Department of Linguistics and Literary Studies, Technische Universitat

Darmstadt

Lorés, Rosa. 2004. “On RA Abstracts: From Rhetorical Structure to Thematic Organization”. English for Specific Purposes 23 (3): 280-302. DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001

Mahmudah, Hajrah, Arni Amir & Muhamad Ahkam Arifin. 2018. “Grammatical Metaphor in Academic Texts of Indonesian Students’ Thesis.”International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI)1(1): 54-61. DOI: 10.33750/ijhi.v1i1.8

Morley, George David. 2000. Syntax in Functional Grammar. An Introduction to Lexicogrammar in Systemic Linguistics. New York: Continuum

Nys, Mathias. 2018. Grammatical Metaphor in Non-Native English Academic Writing A Comparison of Higher-Marked and Lower-Marked Papers Written by Non-Native University Students (Master Thesis). Ghent: Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent University

Ravelli, Louise Jane. 1999. Metaphor, Mode and Complexity: An exploration of Co-varying Patterns. Nottingham: Department of English and Media Studies, Nottingham Trent University

Refnaldi. 2015. “When Verbs Become Nouns: Grammatical Metaphor in Students' Academic Texts”. Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on English Language and Teaching. 3: 27-33. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang

Schleppegrell, Mary Jane.2004. “Technical Writing in a Second Language: The Role of Grammatical Metaphor”. In LJ Ravelli & RA Ellis (Eds.). Analysing Academic Writing: Contextualized Frameworks (172-189). New York: Continuum

Snow, Catherine & Paula Uccelli. 2009. The Challenge of Academic Language. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy (112-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511 609664.008

Wenyan, Gao. 2012. “Nominalization in Medical Papers: A Comparative Study”. Studies in Literature and Language 4(1): 86-93


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 59 times
PDF views : 26 times

Dimensions Metrics

Article History

Submited : 30 July 2021
Revised : 28 January 2022
Published : 27 November 2021

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.