PELATIHAN PENGGUNAAN HOAX BUSTER TOOLS PADA ANGGOTA KARANG TARUNA DAN PKK DI SUKOHARJO

Fathan Fathan* -  IAIN Surakarta, Indonesia
Rhesa Zuhriya Pratiwi -  IAIN Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI : 10.22515/tranformatif.v1i2.2994

The purpose of the service activities carried out by the KPI FUD IAIN Surakarta Study Program is to provide training in using the Hoax Buster Tools for the community, especially youth members of the Youth Organization and PKK mothers in Sukoharjo. The target segmentation is youth of the PERSI Youth Organization in Banmati Village, Sukoharjo District, as well as women members of the PKK Movement in Pucangan Village, Kartasura District, Sukoharjo. Community service activities run smoothly. Both youths and mothers who participated in the activity seemed enthusiastic and active in participating. Through this training, the participants were introduced to the forms and types of hoaxes, how to recognize and identify hoaxes, and verify hoaxes circulating in the community. It is hoped that this service activity can continue, in order to provide education to the public about the importance of media literacy in the digital realm.
Keywords
digital media literacy, hoax, Hoax Buster Tools
  1. Ali, M. (2017). Antara Komunikasi, Budaya dan Hoax. In A. Wahyudin & M. Sunuantari (Eds.), Melawan Hoaks di Media Sosial dan Media Massa. Yogyakarta: Trust Media Publishing & Askopis Press.
  2. Bakri, S., Zulhazmi, A. Z., & Laksono, K. (2019). Menanggulangi Hoaks dan Ujaran Kebencian Bermuatan Isu Suku, Agama, Ras, dan Antargolongan di Tahun Politik. al-Balagh: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 4(2), 199-234.
  3. Gumilar, G., Adiprasetio, J., & Maharani, N. (2017). Literasi Media: Cerdas Menggunakan Media Sosial Dalam Menanggulangi Berita Palsu (Hoax) Oleh Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 35–40.
  4. Harbowo, N. (2019, April). Hoaks Ganggu Stabilitas Nasional. Kompas.
  5. Herawati, D. M. (2016). Penyebaran Hoax dan Hate Speech sebagai Representasi Kebebasan Berpendapat The Spread of Hoax and Hate Speech as The Representation of Freedom of Opinions Abstract : Abstraksi : Promedia: Jurnal Public Relation Dan Media Komunikasi, II(2), 138–155.
  6. Herlina, M., & Husada, S. (2019). Dampak Kejahatan Cyber dan Informasi Hoax terhadap Kecemasan Remaja di Media Online. Promedia (Public Relation dan Media Komunikasi), 5(2).
  7. Heryanto, G. G. (2017). Bisnis Hoaks dan Literasi Digital. Retrieved May 29,2019, from mediaindonesia.com website: https://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/120440-bisnis-hoaks-dan-literasi-digital
  8. Ilahi, H. N. (2018). Women and Hoax News Processing on WhatsApp. JSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 22(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.31865
  9. Juditha, C. (2018). Interaksi Simbolik Dalam Komunitas Virtual Anti Hoaks Untuk Mengurangi Penyebaran Hoaks. Jurnal (PIKOM) Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Pembangunan, 19(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.31346/jpkp.v19i1.1401
  10. Librianty, A. (2017). Survei: Media Sosial Jadi Sumber Utama Penyebaran Hoax. Retrieved May 27, 2019, from www.liputan6.com website: https://www.liputan6.com/tekno/read/2854713/survei-mediasosial-jadi-sumber-utama-penyebaran-hoax
  11. Mastel. (2017). Press Release: Infografis Hasil Survey MASTEL Tentang Wabah Hoax Nasional. Retrieved August 26, 2018, from mastel. id website: http://mastel.id/press-release-infografis-hasil-survey-mastel-tentang-wabah-hoax-nasional/
  12. Mudjiyanto, B. (2019). Kebebasan Berekspresi dan Hoaks. Promedia (Public Relation dan Media Komunikasi) 5(1).
  13. Nasrullah, R. (2014). Teori dan Riset Media Siber (Cybermedia): Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Kencana Media Group.
  14. Nasrullah, R. (2015). Media Sosial: Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, dan Sosioteknologi. In Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3137-4
  15. Pratama, A. B. (2016, 12 29). Retrieved 6 12, 2017, from CNN Indonesia: http://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20161229170130- 185-182956/ada-800-ribu-situs-penyebar-hoax-di-indonesia/
  16. Putra, R. M. D. (2018). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik di Era Disrupsi (Studi tentang Keberlanjutan Inovasi E-Health di Kota Surabaya). Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 6(2), 1–13.
  17. Rahadi, D. R. (2017). Perilaku Pengguna dan Informasi Hoaks di Media Sosial. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 5(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.26905/jmdk.v5i1.1342
  18. Samodro, D. (2019). Mafindo Sebut Ada 997 Hoax Sepanjang 2018. Retrieved May 28, 2019, from www.antaranews.com website: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/811092/mafindo-sebutterjadi-997-hoaks-sepanjang-2018%0A
  19. Sani, A. F. I. (2019). Mafindo Sebut Kabar Hoaks Politik Meningkat di Januari. Retrieved May 27, 2019, from nasional.tempo.co website:https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1185261/mafindo-sebut-kabarhoaks-politik-meningkat-di-januari/full&view=ok
  20. Sutantohadi, A. & Wakhidah, R. (2018). Bahaya Berita Hoax dan Ujaran Kebencian pada Media Sosial terhadap Toleransi Bermasyarakat. DIKEMAS (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat), 1(1).
  21. Tsaniyah, N., & Juliana, K. A. (2019). Literasi Digital Sebagai Upaya Menangkal Hoaks di Era Disrupsi. Al-Balagh: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 4(1), 121-140.
  22. Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE).
  23. Website resmi Mafindo. https://www.mafindo.or.id/about/.
  24. Zamroni, M. (2017). Media Sosial dan Realitas Hidup Masyarakat Postmodern. In A. Wahyudin & M. Sunuantari (Eds.), Melawan Hoax di Media Sosial dan Media Massa. Yogyakarta: Trust Media Publishing & ASKOPIS Press.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2020-11-14
Published: 2020-11-24
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 170 130